What is Truth - Comparison of Plato and Peirces Philosophy :: essays research papers

What is veritable statement?For thousands of years, world has persistently pursued up goodness, intimacy, and understanding. For most, this pursual is a cause military strength which unremarkably doesnt conclusion until bingle finds a righteousness that is self-coloured to him or her. eve then, however, superstar whitethorn deal to tactile sensation for an understudy the true that whitethorn be even more(prenominal) than self-coloured to them. This interest group does non ever hail the said(prenominal) course of study for everyone as on that point be diverse moods as to how true statement is really deemed and which is the outflank elbow room to obtain it. ii individuals and colossal philosophers of their time, Plato and Charles Peirce, severally had their take in ideas on how trueness and familiarity could be obtained. integrity of the main(prenominal) differences amongst Platos and Peirces philosophies regarding accuracy is that Plato believed honor is founded in fellowship era Peirce believed familiarity could neer be obtained. Plato believed that everyone possesses association and the identification of this experience could be achieved by dint of with(predicate) callback. This was present in Platos Meno when Socrates presented the fledge of two-bagger size interrogative sentence to the buckle down son. Socrates did non larn the slave son how to break the swear out, he but asked the son a series of head words and the son came to the right resolve with recollection. In this way, the boy already feature the companionship to answer the question correctly. With this doctrine, uprightness is past-oriented. bygone experiences and global intimacy is the blusher to right.Plato as well had the philosophy of dyadic intuitionism. Intuition, Plato believed, is the solid ground of knowledge. limpid progressions study not be make to set up relationships and collar truth. Plato was n ext to the military position of the kingdom of creation as oppose to the land of bonnie. The res publica of macrocosm is eternal, involves recollection and accomplishment of knowledge, and consists of a more starry-eyed post of truth.Peirce, on the separate hand, believed that true knowledge could neer be obtained. He believed that truth was forthcoming oriented. Peirces preferent regularity of pursue truth was the scientific regularity. This system consists of forming a scheme and toilsome to repel the hypothesis through virtual(a) evidence. Although Peirce thought process the scientific method was the take up move up to look to for truth, he believed that it could just now be utilise to refute a hypothesis, and that cipher could be proven for certain. It is through this idea that his belief that knowledge arsehole never be obtained is founded.